3 ms·
Seems reasonable on one hand but also desperate that one does want to eat in restaurant but unable to follow their social rules.
by geodel 3y ago
Seems reasonable on one hand but also desperate that one does want to eat in restaurant but unable to follow their social rules.
- maximus-decimus 3y ago"social rules" don't supersede the law.
- dymk 3y agoYet people are nice to each other anyways, even when not legally obligated
- maximus-decimus 3y agoWe're not talking about "not legally obligated to do it", we're talking about "being legally obligated not to do it". The law forces them to accept cash, they can't just say "I'm gonna impose my own social norms that are above the law." the equivalent to your example would be them accepting cash even if they don't legally have to. Which is literally the opposite of what they're doing.
- southernplaces7 3y agoFuck their invented social rules. If cash is a legal tender medium of exchange, one should not have to walk into a place that's designed to serve them as a customer and be forced to obey arbitrary customized rules of convenience for the place itself.