It’s technically correct but misleading: the products are not inherently flawed but their lack of MFA means the product wasn’t used in a secure configuration. I

It’s technically correct but misleading: the products are not inherently flawed but their lack of MFA means the product wasn’t used in a secure configuration. I hope that this is held against them by regulators or in court because they’ve known and even advocated for FIDO-2/WebAuthn for years and there’s no excuse for not requiring them by policy.