2 ms·

A more apt comparison is sampling. AI is sampling other's works. Musicians can and do sample. They also obtain clearance for commercial works, pay royalties i

• Minor49er 3y ago
  Musicians overwhelmingly do not even attempt to clear samples. This also isn't a great comparison since samples are taken directly out of the audio, not turned into a part of a pattern used to generate new sounds like what AI generators do with images
  • snakeyjake 3y ago
    Commercial musicians do not? You sure about that? Entire legal firm empires have been built on the licensing, negotiations, and fees that make up the industry. I'm ain't talking about some dude on YouTube or Soundcloud. Few people care about some rando on Soundcloud. Those moles aren't big enough to whack. Vanilla Ice and MC Hammer were. OpenAI is as well. There's even a company that specializes in sample clearance: https://sampleclearance.com https://sampleclearance.com More info: https://www.soundonsound.com/sound-advice/sample-clearance https://www.soundonsound.com/sound-advice/sample-clearance Also: >not turned into a part of a pattern used to generate new sounds like what AI generators do with images This is demonstrably false. Multiple individuals have repeatedly been able to extract original images from AI generators. Here's one-- Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Models https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13188 https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13188 Text, too: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17035 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17035