3 ms·
Wodenokoto has it. A friend was able to use the video to track a parking lot hit-and-run while his car was parked at his wife’s workplace. Bit, there really s
by alistairSH 3y ago
Wodenokoto has it.
A friend was able to use the video to track a parking lot hit-and-run while his car was parked at his wife’s workplace.
Bit, there really should be an easy switch to turn off recording while the car is parked. Maybe even geo-fenced -record in public, but don’t at your home.
- jonhohle 3y agoOr only store recordings locally or only store uploaded videos E2E encrypted. There are lots of ways to preserve owner privacy (not necessarily subject privacy) while preventing employee abuse.
- flutas 3y ago> Or only store recordings locally That's already the case for what he's talking about. Owners manual for that: https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-F311BBCA-2532-4D04-B88C-DBA784ADEE21.html https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_us/GUID-F311BBC...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- NegativeK 3y agoI tracked down a hit and run versus my Tesla with the videos on the in-cabin USB stick. My phone alerted me that the alarm went off. I went out to my car, saw the damage, grabbed the USB stick, and sent the video to my employer so they could find the coworker that did it and have them reach out to me. Tesla also does let you do geofencing with Sentry mode, but I opted to have it running at work and off at home. But none of this addresses the violation of trust that comes with a company having shitty internal controls and shitty auditing on users' data. The US desperately needs a law that makes it clear that user data is owned by users and our rights can't be waived away.
- alistairSH 3y agoBut none of this addresses the violation of trust that comes with a company having shitty internal controls and shitty auditing on users' data. Absolutely agree.