4 ms·
This viewpoint is utterly divorced from reality. I recommend you go read Chevron. The case itself was a massive win for deregulation under Reagan, and overturne
by torstenvl 3y ago
This viewpoint is utterly divorced from reality. I recommend you go read Chevron. The case itself was a massive win for deregulation under Reagan, and overturned a D.C. Circuit opinion by Ruth Bader Ginsburg that invalidated an EPA rule loosening environmental protections just because there was a new administration.
- nielsbot 3y agoWhat I keep reading is this will lead to greater deregulation overall in practice. Example: https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/20/24044179/supreme-court-chevron-doctrine-deference https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/20/24044179/supreme-court-ch...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- nielsbot 3y agoAnother take: https://www.thenation.com/article/society/we-are-witnessing-the-biggest-judicial-power-grab-since-1803/ https://www.thenation.com/article/society/we-are-witnessing-...
- remarkEon 3y agoThis take is completely wrong. Every quote of the SCOTUS justices is done to make a particular point. I would recommend that you go read Chevron, the amicus briefs, the oral argument, and then do the same for the current cases (there are two) for this round.
- torstenvl 3y agoIt's interesting to me that you find partisan political op-eds by non-attorneys persuasive on a highly technical legal subject. Not the choice I would have made.