>I don’t like the accepted answer here, because it criticises Leibniz notation without explaining what it means – and apparently without actually _understanding

>I don’t like the accepted answer here, because it criticises Leibniz notation without explaining what it means – and apparently without actually _understanding_ it, since the author several times writes words to the effect of “this is nonsense” in reference to expressions that in fact make perfect sense when interpreted correctly. Did you look at the posting history at all? I think the poster understands what it means.