> Social/collaboration features are explicitly deprioritized by design; I think this is a natural consequence of srht being built by and for lone wolf developer

> Social/collaboration features are explicitly deprioritized by design; I think this is a natural consequence of srht being built by and for lone wolf developers. It's not the case that SourceHut treats collaboration features as out-of-scope. Drew seems to draw a bright line between social and collaboration features, and intends for SourceHut to offer solid collaboration features, but without any hint of trying to be a social network. From an old comment of Drew's: (edit: I now see Drew's comment was replying to you yourself) > SourceHut is designed to facilitate collaboration, of course, but it's done differently from platforms like GitHub and those that seek to emulate it. And of course it is more than a git frontend, providing tools specifically to facilitate collaboration such as mailing lists and bug trackers. SourceHut is an engineering tool, not a social network. It is designed to get your work done and then get out of your way. > GitHub is explicitly designed like a social network, and this is a design that we reject. (From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31963467 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31963467) > I think this is a natural consequence of srht being built by and for lone wolf developers Built by lone wolf developers, plural?