5 ms·

I know the HN hivemind despises white space and padding and medium width paragraphs and deem them unneccessary and atrocious for some reason, but the design on

I know the HN hivemind despises white space and padding and medium width paragraphs and deem them unneccessary and atrocious for some reason, but the design on the site is not that "functional" - on a window with width of 1035px or less, the main table moves all the way down below the filter column - I can imagine someone opening this with a tablet or something like that for the first time wondering where are all the articles until they scroll all the way down.

Robotbeat 3y ago
It works fine in landscape orientation on an iPhone SE if you zoom out to 50%. I prefer to view websites like this as if my phone was a desktop, and I tend to hate it when that desire is fought by aggressive attempts to reflow everything into a “mobile” format with no way around it. So I think it’s better than many modern websites as far as usability goes.
- Arn_Thor 3y ago
  I’m sorry but I’m just not going to switch off my orientation lock and turn my phone sideways just for a website to “work fine”. It’s 2024. I expect better
  - jcpst 3y ago
    lol! I only type that when something literally makes me laugh out loud. Thank you, this comment made my morning.
    - jcpst 3y ago
      Apologies if this is wasn’t a valuable comment. Earlier it didn’t occur to me that the comment about having to turn their phone sideways might not be sarcasm.
  - marginalia_nu 3y ago
    There's a lot of content you're just not going to be able to partake in then. Tables with more than 3 columns more or less just don't work in portrait mode.
  - listenallyall 3y ago
    Then don't. Just don't visit the site. No harm no foul. Nobody owes you a web site catered to your preferences.
- Y_Y 3y ago
  I blame font sizes. I think everyone but me is wrong and that my phone in portrait mode should be able to show at least 100 characters. The comment im replying takes up about an inch of vertical space, and is spread over six lines, one of which is blank and one is a single word. This is larger than I find ideal but about the same as an average paperback novel. That said I need to twiddle a setting in Android developer options to get even this small. Maybe people want to loom at their phone without their glasses on? maybe less text seems "cleaner"? This is my hill and I'll gladly die on it.
abtinf 3y ago
Lot of people out there buying enterprise hard drives on their tablets? Or are these kinda of purchases most likely being made during work hours sitting in front of a nice screen?
Retric 3y ago
1035 is really low resolution for a tablet. Held vertically a 2012 iPad and initial 2013 iPad Air are both 1536pix wide and 2048 tall. Even a kid targeted 100$ Amazon fire tablet held horizontally is 1200 pixels wide these days.
- tredre3 3y ago
  Real pixels and css pixels aren't the same thing. As far as the website is concerned, the viewport is usually something like 400x900 even on the most expensive ultra mega hi res phone. This gives you an overview: https://blisk.io/devices https://blisk.io/devices
  - Retric 3y ago
    You’re obviously correct. It’s odd, I haven’t dealt with CSS in long enough I’ve completely forgotten about that or perhaps like many CSS issues I have completely blocked it out.

Robotbeat 3y ago

It works fine in landscape orientation on an iPhone SE if you zoom out to 50%. I prefer to view websites like this as if my phone was a desktop, and I tend to hate it when that desire is fought by aggressive attempts to reflow everything into a “mobile” format with no way around it. So I think it’s better than many modern websites as far as usability goes.

Arn_Thor 3y ago
I’m sorry but I’m just not going to switch off my orientation lock and turn my phone sideways just for a website to “work fine”. It’s 2024. I expect better
- jcpst 3y ago
  lol! I only type that when something literally makes me laugh out loud. Thank you, this comment made my morning.
  - jcpst 3y ago
    Apologies if this is wasn’t a valuable comment. Earlier it didn’t occur to me that the comment about having to turn their phone sideways might not be sarcasm.
- marginalia_nu 3y ago
  There's a lot of content you're just not going to be able to partake in then. Tables with more than 3 columns more or less just don't work in portrait mode.
- listenallyall 3y ago
  Then don't. Just don't visit the site. No harm no foul. Nobody owes you a web site catered to your preferences.
Y_Y 3y ago
I blame font sizes. I think everyone but me is wrong and that my phone in portrait mode should be able to show at least 100 characters. The comment im replying takes up about an inch of vertical space, and is spread over six lines, one of which is blank and one is a single word. This is larger than I find ideal but about the same as an average paperback novel. That said I need to twiddle a setting in Android developer options to get even this small. Maybe people want to loom at their phone without their glasses on? maybe less text seems "cleaner"? This is my hill and I'll gladly die on it.

abtinf 3y ago

Lot of people out there buying enterprise hard drives on their tablets? Or are these kinda of purchases most likely being made during work hours sitting in front of a nice screen?

Retric 3y ago

1035 is really low resolution for a tablet. Held vertically a 2012 iPad and initial 2013 iPad Air are both 1536pix wide and 2048 tall. Even a kid targeted 100$ Amazon fire tablet held horizontally is 1200 pixels wide these days.

tredre3 3y ago
Real pixels and css pixels aren't the same thing. As far as the website is concerned, the viewport is usually something like 400x900 even on the most expensive ultra mega hi res phone. This gives you an overview: https://blisk.io/devices https://blisk.io/devices
- Retric 3y ago
  You’re obviously correct. It’s odd, I haven’t dealt with CSS in long enough I’ve completely forgotten about that or perhaps like many CSS issues I have completely blocked it out.