3 ms·

You think he isn't aware of the policies? Or their effects? This death isn't the first. They've had so many problems with heat exhaustion the company hires pri

You think he isn't aware of the policies? Or their effects? This death isn't the first. They've had so many problems with heat exhaustion the company hires private ambulance services so there's no public record of EMS being dispatched to their warehouses. This also isn't the first time they've had people end up outside the warehouse in freezing cold. Then there were the warehouse deaths caused because staff weren't allowed to shelter from a tornado. The list goes on and on.

randomdata 3y ago
> You think he isn't aware of the policies? With millions of employees there is no way he is able to say on top of the policies the workers are putting in place, no. Hell, I've spent enough time in small businesses to observe workers creating boneheaded policies behind the stakeholders' backs, only seeing them come to light when the stupidity caused itself to become known. How are you going to know? Nobody is going to tell you until it is too late. > Or their effects? Yes, most likely he is now aware that someone died as a result of another worker doing something idiotic. Now what? He can command to the workers to stop being idiots. I expect he already does that on a daily basis. But do you think that will really work? If you have ever worked with other people in these types of "low rung" jobs you will know that the worker always thinks they know better. Perhaps that is difficult to fathom from the tech "ivory tower"? Indeed, in tech – and I expect other "high prestige" careers – workers are generally more willing to think things through together and search for the best possible solution.