It doesn't need to be 'xor' pairing between automated detection or a doctor. It can be both. There's interesting work happening under places like ACEMID [0] on

It doesn't need to be 'xor' pairing between automated detection or a doctor. It can be both. There's interesting work happening under places like ACEMID [0] on building models that boost detection accuracy. It's a research project so I have no idea what the final process will look like, but dropped in for a scan the other day, was imaged by a rather neat 360 camera rig [1], then had points of interest flagged for review by a dermatologist. I don't think it's a stretch to envision a process that lets clinicians use more accessible/lower cost imaging devices to help focus their checks, particularly when you consider the ability to compare imaging across scans. [0]: https://acemid.centre.uq.edu.au https://acemid.centre.uq.edu.au [1]: https://www.canfieldsci.com/imaging-systems/vectra-wb360-imaging-system/ https://www.canfieldsci.com/imaging-systems/vectra-wb360-ima...