> I'm suggesting the 5,000km^2 that currently exists as barren nuclear wasteland should be included in the total land attributed to nuclear energy It's definit

> I'm suggesting the 5,000km^2 that currently exists as barren nuclear wasteland should be included in the total land attributed to nuclear energy It's definitely not 'barren'. I'd suggest it should be counted as nature reserves. See: "How Chernobyl has become an unexpected haven for wildlife" https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/how-chernobyl-has-become-unexpected-haven-wildlife https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/how-chernobyl-ha...