3 ms·
`block_on` seems like the right balance of code duplication and overhead, imo. It is a somewhat strange compile time jumble of libraries but a compile time ove
by eximius 3y ago
`block_on` seems like the right balance of code duplication and overhead, imo.
It is a somewhat strange compile time jumble of libraries but a compile time overhead isn't so bad.
- junon 3y agoThis is my take, too. Write async and then use block_on. It's worked for us just fine, albeit a little annoying. We made macros to help clean things up.