2 ms·
Firstly, thank you for the collection of links. Believe it or not, I've been researching this on the side, and there are a few interesting discussions in there
by omginternets 3y ago
Firstly, thank you for the collection of links. Believe it or not, I've been researching this on the side, and there are a few interesting discussions in there I had missed!
>I've softened my position on this and have a grudging respect for where Rust wound up
>I never would have imagined it could even work -- and still don't know that I think the result quite pays for itself.
I concur. There are at least two big reasons to love Rust: type-checking and low overhead. I happen to work in a field where I don't need the latter, but would probably benefit from the former.
(And, I am critically dependent on preemptive concurrency, which not only means that it has to work well, but also that I'm sensitive to ergonomics in this domain.)