3 ms·
"Open source" need to be banned from the titles of these kinds of submissions. Or at least you should have to call it an "API client". The post title as writte
by Cheer2171 3y ago
"Open source" need to be banned from the titles of these kinds of submissions. Or at least you should have to call it an "API client".
The post title as written seems intentionally deceptive.
- Falimonda 3y agoThat sounds like a personal preference. The repo is public and welcomes contributors which by definition is open-source. There's nothing deceptive about it, but you're free to get pedantic over it all you'd like.
- neilv 3y agoI think not everyone understands why it's very important that the term mean more than "I put something in GitHub". Especially when that something is promoting the opposite of open source. (That's "open sores", which is different.)