3 ms·
> Unless there's more too it, There is definitely more to it. We're hearing the story from one side, and there are many good reasons why the parties on the oth
by cbsmith 3y ago
> Unless there's more too it,
There is definitely more to it. We're hearing the story from one side, and there are many good reasons why the parties on the other side wouldn't share all of their context. Honestly, as I was reading it, I was thinking that it was both conceivable this was a gross miscarriage of justice and an outright failing of the police forces, it's also entirely possible that the guy is as guilty as sin and they're just having trouble putting a case together (which is common when dealing with online fraud).
Keep in mind the police forces might arrest someone, but it's the prosecutors that make the decision about whether to bring charges. The prosecutors could have vacated the charge entirely, but chose not to. There's a lot of possible explanations for why they didn't, but that part of it isn't the RCMP's responsibility.
- droopyEyelids 3y agoIt's possible in the same way it's possible to win the lottery. If he is guilty, why did the order fulfillment from Amazon register the delivery from Walmart?
- cbsmith 3y agoWalmart was the recipient of the fraudulent transactions. Amazon was used to obfuscate. The difference between triangular fraud and straight fraud is mostly whether the recipient is in on it.