That’s… not a refutation of my point. AI/flight analogies are tired, but the OPs argument amounts to the equivalent of, before the Wright Brothers, proclaiming

That’s… not a refutation of my point. AI/flight analogies are tired, but the OPs argument amounts to the equivalent of, before the Wright Brothers, proclaiming ‘there’s an inherent inability for humans to ever conceive of a way to engineer heavier than air flight’. It’s a ‘man was never mean to fly, therefore heavier than air flight is impossible’ argument.