> The first thing is the output of a mathematical function as computed by a computer, while the second is an expression of human creativity. The mathematical f

> The first thing is the output of a mathematical function as computed by a computer, while the second is an expression of human creativity. The mathematical function is the expression of human creativity. It consumes other expressions of human creativity, a creativity act in an off itself, to output a different expression of human creativity. Other humans consume the output of the system and the system alike to generate further creative works. An AI model is a higher order creative process, much like humans, and is fundamentally predicated on the creative involvement of humans. Consider the seminal work _Designing Programmes_ by Karl Gerstner if you'd like further consideration of optimizing creative output via self imposed, systematized restrictions and permutations (design programs as meta art). Or alternatively, consider aleatoric music or Toshiko Takaezu for the incorporation of _chance_ into art. There really isn't anything too new here in my book (AI) - just increased scope and fruition. > They do not have emotion. Art does not require an input or output of emotion nor an emotional affect.