3 ms·
IANAL but a company is probably required to guard the data internally, and an employee who's alleged of being somehow related to usage of that data for actions
by goblin89 15y ago
IANAL but a company is probably required to guard the data internally, and an employee who's alleged of being somehow related to usage of that data for actions described would likely be a very serious problem for the whole organization. It's also reasonable to expect from an employee at a serious company to value their position and not to be crazy.
This is what makes me think of a company as less likely to attack me in this particular way than an outside individual, but I may be wrong.
- lawnchair_larry 15y agoThis comment is amusing because network admins at google have been in trouble for abusing their access to harass and stalk underage girls. http://gawker.com/5638874/david-barksdale-wasnt-googles-first-spying-engineer http://gawker.com/5638874/david-barksdale-wasnt-googles-firs...