> if I start to slip at work you can talk to me, discipline me or fire me I think that's what they're getting at here. They're trying to call out things that c

> if I start to slip at work you can talk to me, discipline me or fire me I think that's what they're getting at here. They're trying to call out things that could lead to needing to have these type of conversations and prevent that from happening by preemptively giving examples of problematic scenarios. Under "Not OK" 1 & 3 - Are basically don't work for a competitor at the same time because that's a conflict of interest. Totally fair, IMO, as it opens the company up to lawsuits about trade secrets. 2 & 5 - Are basically don't do work for another company during work hours as it's disruptive. Again, IMO, a totally fair ask. 4 - This is the only one I really see as overstepping a bit. I think they're trying to get at something something similar to #2 (don't let another job take time away from your work here), but it's phrased in a bit of a controlling way.