3 ms·
>> I wish, just like all nations have a budget for defense, that they all have a budget for space exploration. Colonising mars would be the ultimate growth driv
by MichaelRo 3y ago
>> I wish, just like all nations have a budget for defense, that they all have a budget for space exploration. Colonising mars would be the ultimate growth driver. Think interplanetary trade, tourism, asteroid mining. Not to mention population growth and diversity.
Blah blah blah, this is kindergarten level perception of reality and it's really sad that a large swathe of adults cannot conceptualize beyond cheap fantasy.
Main problem with Mars is that is has no magnetic field. Without that any attempt at terraforming it is pointless and wasteful. Say one would devise some scheme to warm the planet and melt the water. Result would be the water would evaporate and the water would be lost in space. Pointless.
There is water there, like oil reserves on Earth. Once burned, it's gone forever.
So first, one must invent some way of generating planetary-scale magnetic field which would envelop the planet and shield it from the solar wind which blows any gas particles away. That doesn't require going to Mars, if it will ever happen it will happen here.
I don't see how but hey ... that's what science is for.
- gumballindie 3y ago> this is kindergarten level perception of reality An interesting projection.
- anang 3y agoIsn’t atmospheric loss on the scale of millions of years? If we were capable of giving mars an atmosphere, surely we’d be capable of topping that atmosphere off when needed? So, even if maybe the terraforming and colony project has a life span of a few million years…that’s still longer that’s humanity has existed.
- bilsbie 3y agoYou’re correct. Moreover a magnetic field is not needed for a planet to have an atmosphere. For example Venus has no magnetic field, and it has a very thick atmosphere, even though it gets 4 times the solar flux as Mars.