3 ms·
I was researching whether there's legal precedent making such uses legal, and ChatGPT pointed out that "Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, I
by lxe 3y ago
I was researching whether there's legal precedent making such uses legal, and ChatGPT pointed out that "Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.," where it was decided that developing a VCR where users can record Universal's content is legal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Unive....
I think this applies here as well. Curious how this will play out.
- lxe 3y agoHere's the chat log if you're curious: https://chat.openai.com/share/6386ad1f-a44d-4cc1-a5d1-0e3c3cbfc748 https://chat.openai.com/share/6386ad1f-a44d-4cc1-a5d1-0e3c3c... Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc.: In this 1992 case, the court held that Accolade's reverse engineering of Sega's game console for the purpose of developing compatible games without licensing was a fair use. Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corporation: In 2000, the court ruled that Connectix's reverse engineering of the Sony PlayStation to create a compatible emulator (Virtual Game Station) was fair use.