4 ms·
The key argument of the paper this is based on is that storing H2 is difficult if you don't have salt caverns. Then you need H2 pressure tanks, and that is expe
by hannob 3y ago
The key argument of the paper this is based on is that storing H2 is difficult if you don't have salt caverns. Then you need H2 pressure tanks, and that is expensive and also requires a lot of energy. And you don't have salt caverns everywhere.
The authors compare this in an energy model, and come to the conclusion that methanol comes out on top if you don't have cheap (aka salt cavern) h2 storage. But of course, there are a lot of assumptions going into this.
Nice bonus: It's an open source model, so others can test it with different assumptions.
- semi-extrinsic 3y agoH2 storage can also be done by liquefaction, which is a lot more practical than compressed when we are talking longish-term storage. Yes, you will use energy to cool and liquefy H2, but a lot of this can be recovered when you go back again.