4 ms·
Aren't these also in FLOPS? The rpi isn't exactly a floating-point monster. Hell, until the Pentium, Intel CPU's weren't guaranteed to even have an FPU. As to
by postmodest 3y ago
Aren't these also in FLOPS? The rpi isn't exactly a floating-point monster. Hell, until the Pentium, Intel CPU's weren't guaranteed to even have an FPU.
As to ARM in general, here's a post about how ARM-1 compared to the 387: https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/24826/did-the-arm-1-really-outperform-the-387 https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/24826/did...
- justin66 3y ago> Hell, until the Pentium, Intel CPU's weren't guaranteed to even have an FPU. 80486
- peterfirefly 3y ago486SX
- justin66 3y agoThe 80486SX was introduced two years after the 80486 and did not have an FPU (unless it was purchased as an option). I think the meaning of my comment was clear: the 80486 was the first Intel CPU guaranteed to have an FPU. I didn't say all the Intel CPUs which came afterward were guaranteed to have them...
- postmodest 3y agoMy first "my own purchase" PC was a 486sx. So as a _line_, "the 486" wasn't guaranteed to have an FPU.
- justin66 3y agoI guess that's true. I never really thought of them as the same thing. Looking over some old info about the "i486" (I swear I had completely forgotten about the i) was a treat. It's only barely believable but I think the sheer annoyingness of Intel's marketing and market segmentation might have actually peaked three decades ago.