> There is nothing that says that a corporation can't optimize their culture to only have workers without children/dependents. Arguably, many already do. As "

> There is nothing that says that a corporation can't optimize their culture to only have workers without children/dependents. Arguably, many already do. As "main child-raiser" (as opposed to "parent", again a place where this matters) is not equally distributed across the sexes in our society, I would say though that (1.) this does leave you at risk of legal challenges over structural discrimination and (2.) it leaves a bad taste when a corporation one the one hand does this, and on the other hand bemoans how few women in "tech" (or any other sector) they're getting. Pushing off kids until the late 30s also has a different risk profile if it's your womb those kids might be coming out of.