4 ms·
I don't think we're losing the macro "why" at all. We may be losing the wisdom of the path they walked to get to their design, which is certainly very valuable
by acjohnson55 3y ago
I don't think we're losing the macro "why" at all. We may be losing the wisdom of the path they walked to get to their design, which is certainly very valuable from a pedagogical and historical perspective.
- corford 3y agoI think that's the point, isn't it? That we're in danger of losing a lot of important history & context that underpinned the "macro"
- fagnerbrack 3y agoYes, that's the whole point I was trying to make. Without history of the why we tend to make the same mistakes all over again. Extracting the why is much more difficult than simply writing a book, there are psychological prompts to do that