I didn't see the animation and was just as confused. I finally shook it off, but it made me more skeptical for the whole article, because I couldn't align with

I didn't see the animation and was just as confused. I finally shook it off, but it made me more skeptical for the whole article, because I couldn't align with judgment of the author. Only now seeing your comment, I realised that there was an animation and now things make sense yes. I think I had scroll at the image + the paragraph below and once I read the paragraph I decided to scroll quite quickly and either to completely new page or I was already focused on the table, because that did seem interesting information. Thinking back now, it's weird how this one thing made me view the whole thing more skeptically, only to realise it was a miscommunication in a way.