3 ms·
How would you suggest getting them to do that, though? We've already got semver and the '~>' operator for rough version matching which should enable what you'r
by regularfry 15y ago
How would you suggest getting them to do that, though? We've already got semver and the '~>' operator for rough version matching which should enable what you're saying. How do we get the people who aren't using semver to switch to it, or something equivalent?
- nwmcsween 15y agoFollow 'semantic versioning' or even better build a table of what is used and limit to a non api missmatch thus no version.
- regularfry 15y agoRight, but again, how do we convince people to do this? The tools are there, but people aren't using them. I don't disagree that it would be better if they did, but I don't see a plan for increasing uptake.