> If you don't know the "who" then now we're asking an LLM does this conversation sound predatory!? But you always will know the 'who' - so, you (the platform)

> If you don't know the "who" then now we're asking an LLM does this conversation sound predatory!? But you always will know the 'who' - so, you (the platform) knows that it's a conversation between an adult and a child unrelated to them and yes, at this stage, simply asking a LLM 'hey is this conversation sus' will give you results that are more than enough to trigger a human level analysis of the interaction. Also you have to consider that adults and unrelated children generally do not interact at all. So, if you wanted to legitimately try and screen off abusers, 'adults that initiated more than 5 conversations with children unrelated to them' then feeding all those interactions into a LLM classifier would get you 99% of the way there.