No thanks, I'd rather not ask Margaret Mead anything, including but not limited to: "where's the restroom?" and "how long until the next bus comes?" Mead is no

No thanks, I'd rather not ask Margaret Mead anything, including but not limited to: "where's the restroom?" and "how long until the next bus comes?" Mead is nothing but a legitimate fraud, and it seems quite clear that her elaborately falsified data has been thoroughly debunked. Why does the NYTimes keep appealing to her alleged authority? It's quite suspicious.