4 ms·
Having streets unable to be accessible by fire response vehicles doesn't seem like a good idea. What would be the alternative here? (genuine question, I'm not f
by elliotto 3y ago
Having streets unable to be accessible by fire response vehicles doesn't seem like a good idea. What would be the alternative here? (genuine question, I'm not from the US)
- akavi 3y agoSmaller fire trucks.
- Paul-Craft 3y agoHow do you plan to make the fires smaller as well?
- beejiu 3y agoCopy paste from Europe, where they are about half the size?
- neuronexmachina 3y agoSome possible reasons for why American fire trucks tend to be larger: * more frequently sent to rural homes, where there might not be an available hydrant, so they need to transport all the water they're likely to need * same for wildfires * American homes more likely to be wood+drywall
- sokoloff 3y agoWhy "wood+drywall" rather than just "wood"? Drywall is non-combustible and used as the main component in many fire-rated wall assemblies.
- akavi 3y agoI would simply have small firetrucks in urban areas, and large fire trucks in rural areas.
- Kon-Peki 3y agoThe more rural you get, the more likely it is that the fire trucks have been purchased secondhand from urban fire departments that can afford to buy new equipment prior to the existing equipment literally falling apart (I've got an extended family member that runs the fire service for an entire county in a western US state, and often see him when he stops at my house while driving new-to-them equipment from the east coast). You've also got a lot of volunteer departments where each firefighter keeps their equipment in their own personal vehicle. Why firetrucks in the US are so large is a good question. In the spirit of Chesterton's Fence, I'd assume that there is a good reason until proven otherwise.
- shiroiuma 3y agoThat's utterly impossible. It's the same reason America can't have public transit: since it doesn't make economic sense in small remote towns of 200 people, then it can't be done in huge cities. I can't explain the logic, but this really is how most Americans think.
- kspacewalk2 3y agoEurope has wildfires and rural areas. How will a large fire truck help you when a wood house is burning? Being grotesquely large doesn't mean they put the fire out faster.
- rangestransform 3y agoB-b-b-b-but bUY amERiCa
- andy81 3y agoUse two trucks when needed? This is a really simple fix that the rest of the world does better.
- mortenjorck 3y agoIndeed, this is a thoroughly solved problem thanks to countries like Japan where urban planning typically allows meandering networks of narrow, pedestrian-friendly streets. This article has some nice points of comparison between typical American firetrucks and a Japanese firetruck: https://www.sfchronicle.com/local/article/Meet-Kiri-the-tiny-Japanese-fire-truck-bringing-16137119.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/local/article/Meet-Kiri-the-tiny...
- aga98mtl 3y agoAnd yet, European cities exist and are fine without wide streets.
- eru 3y agoKeep in mind that Europeans tend to build with stone / bricks, and Americans tend to build with wood. Lots of safety regulations stem from that divide. Wood is a bit more flammable. (I'm not saying the difference in safety regulations still make sense today. I'm talking about one of the historical origins of the divide.)
- jenadine 3y agoIn the north of Europe it is mostly wood
- eru 3y agoHouses are still less likely to be build from wood than in the US.
- Gravityloss 3y agoapartment buildings are made from prefabricated concrete elements though