3 ms·
That makes more sense, though it still looks like a dangerous abridgment of due process if the country that actually seizes the assets feels no need to launch a
by kijin 15y ago
That makes more sense, though it still looks like a dangerous abridgment of due process if the country that actually seizes the assets feels no need to launch an independent investigation to find out whether or not the allegations have any merit.
- Joakal 15y agoI hope the NZ government revises their extradition treaty in this light. USA has a legal reputation of trumped up charges to force a plea deal despite no trial. Especially if they can play the card of 'money laundering' which legally allows them to seize every asset and cash. USA is becoming a very dangerous country.
- erichocean 15y agoIt's been that way for awhile, mostly due to the War on Drugs (although the War on Terror also helped kick things into gear on the surveillance side). Given the sum of world history, I don't see how this ends well.
- rbanffy 15y agoWe are now between two stable states - the US will not be as an important player in the early 21st century as it was in the late 20th - and a lot is at stake right now. I can only hope we can all elect governments wise enough to ensure a smooth transition because trying to prevent - or even postpone - it will only make it more violent and unpredictable.