3 ms·
I'll post it on your site as well to give it a bit of traffic, but here's one of the goofier rejections I've gotten. ----------- I applied to a large newspape
by tombert 3y ago
I'll post it on your site as well to give it a bit of traffic, but here's one of the goofier rejections I've gotten.
-----------
I applied to a large newspaper (I won't say the name but you've definitely heard of it) as a software engineer. They made me do some idiotic Myers-Briggs style test that took me about two hours to do, which was annoying, but the pay seemed like it would be ok and I was unemployed anyway.
Outside of an ITIL certification that I had to get for college, my resume is extremely technical, as I've only ever done engineering. I have bullet points about different tech I've used, programs I've written, and basic tasks I did for the company. I've had a ton of jobs so the resume is long, and basically devolves into a bunch of software engineering buzzwords. We can argue all day on whether it's good or not, but I don't think anyone would claim it's not technical [1].
Nowhere on my resume (outside of one line that said I mentored some junior and mid-level engineers and some lecturing I did for two semesters) does it say that I've done any kind of "people management", but the response I got from the recruiter was as follows:
> Does not show technical keywords or statements in his resume. Showing to be more of a PM and not a hands-on coder. Not see enough Java experience. I don't see him as a focused Java developer like the other candidate you've sent us. Needs someone who can write the code.
I found this extremely bizarre, as I don't really think my resume could in any way be interpreted as a PM's resume, and assuming I wasn't lying I feel that it's pretty obvious I am a "hands on coder".
I think what happened is that the hiring manager already knew who they wanted for the job, but for legal and/or bureaucratic reasons they had to have a pretense of "trying to find the best candidate". I suspect that they never even looked at my resume, had some basic boilerplate rejection text that had some vague plausibility, and was just going to reject every candidate sent to them.
That's fine, but I really wish they had done this before I had to spend multiple hours trying to get a read on my personality. I think a lot of hiring managers are sociopaths.
[1] https://gitlab.com/tombert/Resume/-/blob/master/resume.pdf?ref_type=heads https://gitlab.com/tombert/Resume/-/blob/master/resume.pdf?r...
- dghlsakjg 3y agoCould it be that they just sent the wrong person's feedback?
- tombert 3y agoSo I asked the recruiter about that specifically, because that would be an easy mistake to make. The recruiter agreed, reached out to the hiring manager again, and the hiring manager doubled down. The recruiter was extremely apologetic to me, and he agreed that the feedback made absolutely no sense to him either, but the manager had assured him that the feedback was correct. I suppose another potential thing that happened is that they did send the wrong feedback, the hiring manager was embarrassed and just doubled down as a sign of bravado. Hard to say for sure.