4 ms·
Well, apparently the courts think it is equivalent, at least in Germany and the United States. That you favor one argument over another as your lens with which
by williamcotton 3y ago
Well, apparently the courts think it is equivalent, at least in Germany and the United States.
That you favor one argument over another as your lens with which to side when it comes to really stupid analogies, including mine, is entirely in bad faith.
- hypeatei 3y agoSo your argument is that since the courts think a certain way, that we should accept that and move on?
- williamcotton 3y agoI agree with the courts. Most people so outside of a vocal minority on this forum. What is you plan if you disaggre?
- hypeatei 3y agoIt's just a fundamental disconnect then, I guess. You and I have a very different understanding of how this "crime" was carried out. He was charged for connecting to a database with credentials that he was already connecting to before with the application. I could argue that he already had access to the other data because the connection allowed it. So, that begs the question: what did he actually "break" into and how is it different than connecting to the database via the app on the same PC? Would you even be able to tell the difference as a sysadmin looking at logs?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- williamcotton 3y agoIf you want to argue about the law, you can! There is this entire profession dedicated to this!