5 ms·

> The only reason it's immoral not to pay taxes is because it's immoral to break the law, at least if the law is just Surely it's also immoral because it's mor

• philwelch 15y ago
  If it had to do with contributing to the society around you, surely it would be the same obligation regardless of the tax laws, wouldn't it? Yet no one voluntarily pays more than the tax rate, and nearly everyone takes all the deductions and tax credits they can.
  • AlisdairO 15y ago
    Right - the difference between the two is that deductions and tax credits are explicitly entered into the law to define what someone should be paying. The corporate tax rates that Apple pays in California are instead a reflection of the law's inability to effectively extract the money that society wants to - loopholes are involuntarily, while tax deductions are intended.
    • joesb 15y ago
      > deductions and tax credits are explicitly entered into the law to define what someone should be paying. So if a company follow the law and they gets tax deduction, it means that that's the tax the society agree that the company should be paying, right? > loopholes are involuntarily, while tax deductions are intended. So can the company exercise tax deduction without being called using a loophole? Is it ever intended for tax deduction to be okay for a company?
      • AlisdairO 15y ago
        Of course it's often intended for a tax deduction to be okay. I'm not quite sure what the thrust of your argument is - are you trying to imply that loopholes as a concept are invalid?