3 ms·
Agreed that origin commenter's two parents are not a great enough sample size to gauge the popularity of generative AI implementations such as ChatGPT.
by eagleusr 3y ago
Agreed that origin commenter's two parents are not a great enough sample size to gauge the popularity of generative AI implementations such as ChatGPT.
- lm28469 3y agoThe data point is the article and reality. My comment was just part of the answer, aka real world AI usage is nowhere close to what people want to believe here. One commenter says everyone under 30 has a paid chatgpt account, yet chatgpt as a self reported user base of 185 millions, with only 100 millions unique active user per week, a far cry from every people under 30 with a spare 20$. Even if every single one of these people installed bing on all their devices it wouldn't make a dent... chrome is used by more than 3b people. I took a bet last year on this very forum about how chatgpt wouldn't become anywhere to what the HN prophets promised, I can take another bet for 2025 lmao https://www.demandsage.com/chatgpt-statistics/ https://www.demandsage.com/chatgpt-statistics/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/543218/worldwide-internet-users-by-browser/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/543218/worldwide-interne...