6 ms·
After considerable thought, far before this article landed, I have to agree. I have no problem with AI inventing new things. But purporting to be something else
by dotancohen 3y ago
After considerable thought, far before this article landed, I have to agree. I have no problem with AI inventing new things. But purporting to be something else - the potential for confusion is far too great. A human parody that contains obvious clues that even those unfamiliar with the subject would recognize as not being the subject - that's fine. But a near-perfect copy of the subject of satire, that is too far. Way too far. The potential for abuse is far too great.
Obviously, banning such usage will not prevent outlaws and rogue states from doing this very thing. The goal of the banning is to send a clear signal that in our society, we do not accept such things. Much like chemical weapons. It will also help contain the spread of such things in our society even if our enemies try to send it to us, like child pornography.
- oceanplexian 3y agoWhat’s your plan to enforce it? Because passing a law doesn’t magically eliminate a problem. Often times laws increase the behavior they are trying to prevent, like drug laws.
- axus 3y agoHow about something like "Sassy Justice", where the image is almost identical, the voice is similar, but where a different name is used and no claim is made to be Donald Trump?