2 ms·
Slightly different take: it was a state contract fulfilled by the company best able to impress state procurement. Quality is rarely on the agenda for this sort
by robertlagrant 3y ago
Slightly different take: it was a state contract fulfilled by the company best able to impress state procurement. Quality is rarely on the agenda for this sort of procurement, because if it goes wrong they can blame the management who were overseeing the implementation. Thus it was unlikely to be great from early on.