3 ms·
No, government R&D dollars did. Most of the significant advanced were "too risky" for corporations to view them as growth opportunities. Even though taxpayers f
by drekk 3y ago
No, government R&D dollars did. Most of the significant advanced were "too risky" for corporations to view them as growth opportunities. Even though taxpayers fund the studies they're charged not only for the products but to read the results.
- oatmeal1 3y agoGovernment is a double-edged sword. Classifying drugs like psilocybin as class 1, meaning researchers couldn't even study it. Also, 13 year approval process makes it extremely expensive to try to get a drug to market. Of course government R&D dollars are needed!