4 ms·
The actual question seems to be if humans are more resilient to errors in their training data. I would assume so.
by lynx23 3y ago
The actual question seems to be if humans are more resilient to errors in their training data. I would assume so.
- ben_w 3y agoAs a relative statement, I'm not sure if AI or humans are better or worse (or even "it depends on what you're measuring"), but in an absolute sense humans are also pretty suggestible and easy to influence, and it's only countervailing influences pushing in other directions that turn it into noise. This space is where the Venn diagram of marketing and genocides overlap.