3 ms·

Are all the details of this out in the open yet? Certainly there were bugs that made it seem like there was more money coming in than actually did, but it seem

Are all the details of this out in the open yet? Certainly there were bugs that made it seem like there was more money coming in than actually did, but it seems like also there were capabilities in the platform that would also allow editing records to make it seem like there was actually less money coming in, which would enable skimming money out of the system almost (?) invisibly.

thinkingemote 3y ago
Some details are there, see the inquiry website. From what I gather the "covert" remote access could only add records rather than edit records. Like putting something on a message stack. However you could add a record to edit a balance I imagine. Where "records" are "messages". I don't think you could actually get money out that way only remotely. Also a record of the record would be made, you couldn't erase remote access activities on the stack. I also don't think this capability was ever suggested anywhere as being used in conjunction with a postmaster to skim money out. Maybe its possible in theory?