3 ms·
I didn't comment on the categories of “dominant player” or “duopoly" ? If you want to make a point about this instead, related topics, which companies fall int
by MichaelZuo 3y ago
I didn't comment on the categories of “dominant player” or “duopoly" ?
If you want to make a point about this instead, related topics, which companies fall into these buckets, etc., that's fine. But there's no need to disguise it.
- csa 3y ago> I didn't comment on the categories of “dominant player” or “duopoly" ? Maybe you should have. I get the feeling that you’re trying to win an argument over the use of the term “monopoly”, when what people are concerned about is anti-competitive behavior (which can happen in monopolies, duopolies, dominated markets, etc.). As I mentioned before, fixating on the use of the term “monopoly” doesn’t accomplish much and seems to miss the overarching point of the discussion.
- MichaelZuo 3y agoAnyone is free to 'fixate' on whatever topic they want? Just like how you can be 'fixating' on this? There's not that many HN users who can change what someone else decides, and you don't belong in that category, hence my opinion is just don't disguise it under a different angle. Otherwise, I simply don't care either way about those claims.