3 ms·

Thanks for the upvotes. Here is a more technical deep dive comparing the three main open formats - https://www.onehouse.ai/blog/apache-hudi-vs-delta-lake-vs-ap

• dikei 3y ago
  That comparison blog seems biased toward Hudi.
  • lalaland1125 3y ago
    Biased in what way? The authors provide solid arguments for why they think Hudi is a good tool.
    • prepend 3y ago
      Biased in that the authors seem to favor Hudi and the arguments for seem based on that favor rather than an objective presentation of all relevant factors.
    • atwebb 3y ago
      I think it is also wrong in the capabilities, example: Redshift should be able to read Iceberg via Redshift Spectrum. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/querying-iceberg.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/querying-iceb...
• chimerasaurus 3y ago
  I talk to customers basically all day about table formats. Only one customer has really brought up Hudi in a meaningful way. IMO, Hudi is basically out of contention for 95%+ of people looking at table formats.
• 62951413 3y ago
  For a Spark shop Delta is the default choice. If you deploy to AWS then Glue encourages you to go with Iceberg. What makes people use Hudi?