> However, what they are defining as "private equity" seems to be pretty amourphous It is an English anguage report, not an engineering document. In that cont

> However, what they are defining as "private equity" seems to be pretty amourphous It is an English anguage report, not an engineering document. In that context it is crystal clear what is meant by "private equity". It is completely different from "private ownership" It is not a problem at all. There is a similar issue with objecting to comparing out comes. The effects are not able to be finely measured,but the scale of the effects makes that a pointless quibble. The entry of private equity into health businesses, rolling them up into large groupings then squeezing them for profit has been documented in many places. Objecting because the measurements and descriptions are not perfectly precise is not very good. (It is in the "squeezing for profit" that the problem lies - incase you need some help)