2 ms·
Then that means it’s a big gain for the population of the world and she could not have left soon enough. I hope mark finds himself rudderless and meanders the
by mc32 3y ago
Then that means it’s a big gain for the population of the world and she could not have left soon enough.
I hope mark finds himself rudderless and meanders the company into a whirlpool,
- dylan604 3y ago> Then that means it’s a big gain for the population of the world and she could not have left soon enough. How do you come to that conclusion? It's not like just because she's gone means that Meta will stop doing anything that she implemented. She could leave and Meta changes nothing about what they do, and there would be 0 gain for the "population of the world" that you seem think will happen. > I hope mark finds himself rudderless and meanders the company into a whirlpool, As if. The Zuck will find someone else to lead, and our luck it will be someone with even less self control or care about the users than the person leaving. Sometimes, the devil you know is much more preferable to the devil that could come after. We can see how well either of our comments age though
- 0max 3y agoI'd be glad to see the data cap loopholes they've negotiated with overseas telcos get their contracts canceled and not renewed
- dylan604 3y agoAgain, just because Sandberg isn't there means that the army of lawyers that actually do this kind of work will cease to do that work? The logic just doesn't flow