4 ms·
> I mean I gotta give respect to Apple. They seem to have done the minimal technical compliance with the order. it's borderline contempt of court > I can resp
by blibble 3y ago
> I mean I gotta give respect to Apple. They seem to have done the minimal technical compliance with the order.
it's borderline contempt of court
> I can respect though how they approached a potentially large setback for their business.
I'd be pretty mad if I was the judge, they might like my 2nd ruling even less
- robertlagrant 3y agoHopefully the judge isn't like that. Bit of a silly character trait for a judge.
- blibble 3y agoturns out courts don't like people treating them with contempt
- robertlagrant 3y agoDoesn't mean you get angry, though. Just judge and move on.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoI dont think the courts are bothered at all. Apple is complying with the ruling, and exercising the rights the court agreed it has.
- gruez 3y ago>it's borderline contempt of court I don't see how that's the case when judge explicitly mentions that apple is entitled to be paid for their IP.
- nodamage 3y agoThe judge literally suggested Apple could do this in her ruling: "Even in the absence of IAP, Apple could still charge a commission on developers. It would simply be more difficult for Apple to collect that commission." "The Court presumes that in such circumstances that Apple may rely on imposing and utilizing a contractual right to audit developers annual accounting to ensure compliance with its commissions, among other methods."