5 ms·
So, you essentially took my project ( https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode ), and instead of co
by lgrammel 3y ago
So, you essentially took my project ( https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode ), and instead of contributing to it or forking it, you recommitted all the code under your own name, with a few small tweaks.
To be fair, I saw that you give credit, but it's kind of disappointing still given that prob 98% of the project is the work of the Rubberduck contributors. I know Rubberduck is not that active any more, but it's still disappointing.
- jstasiak 3y agoCredit aside, if this is mostly your code there may be a copyright/license issue. The original license: https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode/blob/f11a6354b2c20840e5e8efcd53e3fda3bcec6b22/LICENSE https://github.com/rubberduck-ai/rubberduck-vscode/blob/f11a... The new project: https://github.com/srikanth235/privy/blob/9b4f8ce7e176ab45d594b86c53edf700041b6712/LICENSE https://github.com/srikanth235/privy/blob/9b4f8ce7e176ab45d5... no mention of the original copyright
- bearjaws 3y agoShout out to OP for ModelFusion. Probably one of the better ways to use LLMs instead of just integrating the OAI API and reinventing the rest of the wheel. Handles lots of corner cases and lets you swap in other models easily. https://github.com/lgrammel/modelfusion https://github.com/lgrammel/modelfusion
- lgrammel 3y agoThanks!
- fuddle 3y agoThey should include the original copyright notice in their version of the software according to your license.
- ui90909090 3y agoI am genuinely curious to know, what is your expectation here? He gave you credit in Github. He called it forever "indebted", which IMO is too much. You put out code under MIT license. MIT license means anyone can take the copy and fork it. Why are you disappointed? Are you disappointed because a person of Indian origin did it better than you Or are you disappointed that because you wanted all fame but he took your code fork (still valid under MIT license) and did a better marketing than you with wrapper. If you don't want people to use your use, put behind paywall. It is not difficult to understand.
- lgrammel 3y agoMy expectation would have been a fork, or a repo thats started with the full commit history.
- rbut 3y agoConsidering both repositories are on Github, actually forking it instead of re-commiting it all as 'init commit' would be a good start. As you said, nothing compels srikanth235 to do this though, but it's a generally more respectable (acceptable?) way to continue someone elses work as a new project. Also not sure why you had to bring the race of srikanth235 into it.
- ui90909090 3y ago[flagged]
- vunderba 3y agoYou need to step back, cool down and get some perspective. No rational person on the planet could interpret his critique as having any racism or even racist undertones. srikanth235 made the right move by acknowledging the contributor list from the previous project that was lost due to this repo not being a fork of the original.
- anakaine 3y ago
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- srikanth235 3y agoHi @lgrammel, my intention was not to undermine the contributions made by you and others. Added all the original missing contributor's list to the repo. The commit link is http://tinyurl.com/2uzdefak http://tinyurl.com/2uzdefak.
- lgrammel 3y agoThanks, I appreciate it! Good luck with the project!