3 ms·
Your link to the guidelines doesn't prevent me from implying you're directing away from the point, and nor should it. >I'm arguing that policy preferences arou
by ricardo81 3y ago
Your link to the guidelines doesn't prevent me from implying you're directing away from the point, and nor should it.
>I'm arguing that policy preferences around copyright infringement have changed in general.
Perhaps they have, and I take on your take on that. In the end you were replying to me and the original poster so respect the spirit of those posts.
- vertere 3y agoYou seem to have a very narrow view of what is a relevant or a valid comment. Just because a counterargument doesn't completely refute the original comment, or "introduces" new concepts, doesn't make it irrelevant or "misdirection". Someone compared treatment of X 20 years ago to treatment of Y today -- seems pretty natural to bring up treatment of X more recently. You can't just say "the original comment didn't mention it so you can't mention it either". I don't see how your accusations of bad faith are warranted.
- ricardo81 3y agoIf your doubts are true, why did you have to introduce an analogy? I feel I have a pretty open view. And, there's no definition of a 'valid' comment. I'll address points, raise points or whatever. Sorry, I'm not in the realm of 'valid' comments, never was.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> why did you have to introduce an analogy? GP made a comparison! How do you refute a comparison without criticising the comparison? > I'm not in the realm of 'valid' comments, never was Claiming misdirection is an argument about validity.