3 ms·
Yes, you are right. But. People do abuse the protections, which are too lengthy, makes possible to sell rights, etc. In the end, corporations (ab)uses (buy an
by 8jef 3y ago
Yes, you are right. But.
People do abuse the protections, which are too lengthy, makes possible to sell rights, etc.
In the end, corporations (ab)uses (buy and sell rights) protections for amassing fortunes much bigger than the original creator ever got. That's not right, not fair, at all. System's broken, need fix, throw it all out and build something new, centered around creators.
Give back to creators only, for less time.
- ImPleadThe5th 3y agoI can get behind that for sure. I just don't like the blanket "get rid of IP" especially when we are talking about AI companies which already well surpased the legal and ethical limits of it.
- 8jef 3y agoIP rights are about retribution to the creators. It might be more important to fix the retribution paradigm rather than fixing IP, which is a broken system. At the moment, most creators are starving, while everyone, AI included, are feeding on them - big time. Successful then powerful creators only may dream about making AI pay - to them only. Maybe it's time for some minimum revenue scheme for all creators, on top of heavy limitations on IP. Maybe AI corps can pay for that?