>[Gorsuch] noted that the two cases pending at the Supreme Court — both of which concern a commercial fishing rule that requires fishermen to pay for regulatory

>[Gorsuch] noted that the two cases pending at the Supreme Court — both of which concern a commercial fishing rule that requires fishermen to pay for regulatory monitors on their boats — led to disparate findings of ambiguity in the lower courts despite a relatively basic question. It seems pretty reasonable to enforce meaningful laws rather than fall back to "federal agencies can just decide what this law means." Especially when "ambiguity" itself becomes ambiguous.