3 ms·
I don't understand why he wouldn't just live in OH, save money for a house, and in the mean time commute to NYC for, let's say, one week a month. This seems che
by karaterobot 3y ago
I don't understand why he wouldn't just live in OH, save money for a house, and in the mean time commute to NYC for, let's say, one week a month. This seems cheaper and more pleasant, and easier to plan, and less physically exhausting, and more obvious. Does his work as a journalist require him to be physically located at the company, but on an irregular schedule? I'm trying to figure out the series of requirements and constraints that make this behavior seem like the best choice. Interesting article, but just not enough details in it for me to understand it to my admittedly naive satisfaction.
- kelnos 3y agoHe addresses this: > The Wall Street Journal requires office attendance at least three days a week Looks like WSJ has another dumb RTO policy that makes life miserable for everyone, likely without actually any real benefit to the company.
- karaterobot 3y agoMissed that, thanks.